| Prevalence
Various older studies indicate that about
one-third of all homosexuals will have a problem with substances at some time in their
lives (Diamond-Friedman, 1990). In a more recent study, however, McKirnan & Peterson
(1989) come to a strikingly different conclusion. Based on their very large (n=3,400) and
well-controlled study, they criticize earlier studies as being biased for several reasons,
not the least of which is that they were made in gay bars of the bar-going population.
McKirnan & Peterson (1989, p. 549) found the following percentages of homosexuals
reporting alcohol problems:
|
General Population |
Homosexual Sample |
| Age |
Men |
Women |
Men |
Women |
| 18-25 |
29 |
16 |
26 |
24 |
| 26-30 |
25 |
7 |
25 |
23 |
| 31-40 |
16 |
8 |
24 |
25 |
| 41-60 |
7 |
4.5 |
19 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall |
16 |
8 |
23 |
23 |
Significantly, up to age 30
the homosexual men in the study show no higher incidence of alcoholism than men in the
general population (although homosexual women show significantly higher levels). But after
age 30, the high incidence of alcohol problems declines much less in the homosexual
population than it does in the general population.
Why are older homosexuals at greater risk
of alcoholism? The author has found no sufficient explanation in the literature. McKirnan
& Peterson (1989) suggest that psychosocial or cultural variables in the homosexual
population might be responsible for increased alcoholism in the later years. They
hypothesize that homosexual men and women do not typically enter traditional marriages or
childbearing roles as they age, are often not in mainstream occupations, and do not
typically adhere to traditional sex roles, all of which encourage control of drinking. The
author suggests that more significant than "encouraging the control of
drinking," the functions of childbearing and childrearing may have a significant part
in the emotional happiness and stability of the parents, being biologically ego-syntonic
which, in turn, could relieve feelings of loneliness and lack of fulfillment which give
impetus to drink.
Author suggests several other explanations
as to why today's older gays have a higher rate of alcoholism:
Today's older homosexuals faced a more
closeted life in their young years, with a much higher prevalence of the stressors
discussed above. Gay liberation had not yet struck. They began drinking heavily earlier
and, addiction being a disease most frequently progressing into middle age before being
addressed, were addicted by their middle 30's. Thus, the higher rates of alcoholism in
those over 30 shown by McKirnan & Peterson (1989) may be caused by an even higher
incidence of alcoholism in the pre-liberation group, which is now in its 30's, 40's and
50's. That male homosexuals under the age of 30 should show no greater incidence of
addiction may be a testament to the positive effects of gay liberation.
Another untested hypothesis which occurs to
the author is that many older homosexuals (say, over 35) are faced with the daunting task
of competing for lovers, friends, and sexual partners in the unrelentingly youth-oriented,
beauty-driven gay culture. One of the major tasks of middle age for homosexuals is to
reach acceptance that they are no longer able to compete for lovers or sexual partners on
the basis of beauty (of which youth, in the homosexual population, is ordinarily a
requisite), and accept that their sex and love lives may be substantially less fulfilling,
or fulfilling in different ways, than when they were younger. Many homosexuals as they
pass 35 turn increasingly to drugs and alcohol for solace and companionship.
|